Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:26
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Fans don't appear to be snatching up tickets to the Club World Cup - KING5.com
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Baseball Gameday: 5/31/25 vs. TCU - Oregon State University Athletics
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Hedge funds seek to expand into private credit - Financial Times
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
‘The Last Of Us Part II’ Insists There’s Artistry In All Of Its Violence - Defector
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Scoop: Every Senate Dem demands Trump withdraw military from Los Angeles - Axios
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Mario Kart World is the perfect Switch 2 launch game - The Verge
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Do you think Harris will win thanks to Taylor Swift and the Swifties?